Kenyon College has a formal mentoring program that takes new tenure-track faculty members through their first two years at the College, but the need for effective mentoring goes well beyond that. The best mentoring relationships, furthermore, are often those that develop informally, building on shared interests, mutual affection, and respect. This guide encourages you to find and cultivate effective mentors, both within the formal mentoring system and outside of it. It starts with the premise that a good mentoring relationship is as much the responsibility of the protégé as the mentor.
A few critics of mentoring programs argue that new faculty have already gained all they need to know about teaching and being a member of a faculty from their graduate study and long observation in academic settings. Graduate schools are generally not the best places to find models for good teaching, however, and many faculty members begin the profession with little practical experience and little knowledge of educational theory.
Faculty members new to Kenyon often have had at least some teaching experience in graduate school; increasingly, newcomers to Kenyon have already taught at other colleges and universities. Does this mean they can do without mentors at Kenyon? A recent book, New Faculty: A Practical Guide for Academic Beginners, closes with this thought: "One of the most important challenges you confront as a new faculty member is to develop a sense for the performance norms to which your work will be expected to conform and by which it will be judged by others."1.
Even seasoned teachers coming from other settings may not be sure how much reading can be assigned for each class, whether Kenyon students must sign an honor code, whether one's office door should be open if one is there, and how his or her department regards conference presentations or publications with multiple co-authors. The written rules and regulations of each academic setting and each department, not to mention the implicit and taken-for-granted expectations, have to be learned by any newcomer. Each department at Kenyon has developed its own guidelines for what constitutes "scholarship" for purposes of our faculty review system. These guidelines are all available on the Provost's website.
Certainly, it is not easy to assess the long-term impact of mentoring in persons' development, but one set of authors who surveyed the literature on this topic were convinced of the benefits: "Faculty with mentors have been found to be more productive, to receive more competitive grants, to publish more, and they indicate higher career and job satisfaction, while achieving greater long-term success than those not mentored."2 Those who receive good mentoring exhibit greater political savvy, feel more confident about taking professional risks, profess to feel more confident about their teaching, and tend to be more prolific researchers, according to Christopher Lucas and John Murry.
What prevents some people from finding good mentors? Some new faculty want to avoid the impression of "remediation," as if needing advice indicates a deficiency. Others do not see how, given the demands of teaching and scholarship, that they could possibly find the time for it, fearing that such a relationship might demand more time from them than it proved to be worth. Some truly feel they don't need any help and will be able to figure out things for themselves well enough.
Many of us are attracted to academic life partly because it affords us great autonomy. Scholarship is often a solitary pursuit, and we often shape and teach our classes without significant collaboration with our peers. Mentoring programs are designed to counter this singularity so that new colleagues can more quickly adjust to the Kenyon setting, benefit from the lessons others have learned before them, and understand the standards against which their performance will be judged.
Arriving at Kenyon, you will have ready contact with others in your department. Tenure-track faculty will also be assigned a Lead Mentor – typically someone not in the new faculty member's department. There are other opportunities to meet people outside your department as well. As you share your interests with them and learn about their interests, keep in mind your need to cultivate good mentors. Invite someone for coffee and conversation about your scholarly interests, or ask if you can drop by their office to talk about something on your mind. Your department chair and your Lead Mentor may also have suggestions about colleagues outside the department who have something in common with you or perhaps who practice a kind of pedagogy that you use. Your Lead Mentor will help you develop a mentoring committee that responds to your particular needs and aspirations.
You will be asking lots of questions -- of everyone -- in your early weeks at Kenyon. Administrative assistants will be an invaluable resource as you learn how to order books for your classes, how to get things copied, how to access the Course of Study on line, and how to use the automatic email distribution lists for your classes. Librarians can answer your questions about course reserves including electronic reserves. The Dean for Academic Advising and many others will be ready to help you learn the ropes of Kenyon as well. In this sense, mentoring is truly a community effort that occurs every year as new members enter the faculty. The annual orientation for new faculty that the Associate Provosts organize is where your formal mentoring starts in earnest. In this orientation and your one-to-one relations, it pays to speak up about what you need and what you what to know in these early days and weeks at the College.
With your faculty colleagues and formal mentors, regular contact is essential. While the mentoring group operates together at the end of the year, it may or may not meet as a group and with the member at other times. Most mentoring will take place through one-to-one dyads. A rule of thumb might be to try to meet with each of your mentors once a month.
There is plenty to talk about, and it is probably best to focus on only or a few things at each meeting. Useful topics of discussion might include:
Near the end of your first academic year at the College, the mentoring group will meet with you to discuss your progress. The purpose of this meeting is wholly formative, aiming to help the new faculty member develop as a teacher, scholar, and citizen and to prepare you for the formal reviews that lie ahead if you hold a tenure-track position. You and your committee members should also each fill out the Mentoring Program Evaluation form, found the Provosts’ webpage, by June 1. This report will not become part of the dossiers used in your reviews for reappointment and tenure. The purpose of this report, is simply to confirm and assess the year’s mentoring activities.
A similar process takes place at the end of the second year. One of the main purposes of this meeting is to anticipate the pretenure review that typically occurs in the following year. The Mentoring Program Evaluation form should be completed by June 1.
Cultivating good mentors is a habit to acquire in your early years and to keep as you move up the faculty ranks. Navigating the tenure review process, and later that of promotion to full professor should prompt you to seek advice widely from those who have successfully passed that way before. Academic careers often span three decades, and beyond promotion lie still other challenges - staying fresh after you have taught the same introductory course 20 times, finding points of connection with students who seem to get younger and younger, staying current with developments in your field, finding the time and energy for scholarship, resisting the tendency to withdraw from collegiate service rather than move into the leadership positions merited by your rank and experience. Talking about these challenges and changes with others, and remaining open to advice and example are traits to cultivate early and keep for the duration of an academic career.
RSK 2004
Revised JET 2015, JAB 2019